top of page
Writer's picturePolitical Life

Court rejects bid from Water Board majority to stop official from using letterhead


Leticia Vasquez-Wilson

An L.A. Superior Court Judge has tossed a request to restrain Water Director Leticia Vasquez-Wilson from using the letterhead of the Central Basin Municipal Water District.


The District had filed a lawsuit against Vasquez-Wilson, demanding that she stop giving interviews to community newspapers like our own. The Board also alleged that when she used letterhead to communicate with the cities of Downey, Lakewood, Signal Hill, and others, that she created the impression that the was representing the Board.


The documents are available for download below.



Vasquez-Wilson has been noted in the community for her very public approach to issues surrounding the affordability and safety of water in Southeast Los Angeles County. She has protested Assembly Member Christina Garcia, who has been criticized for her push to privatize the water in the region. She has also criticized one of the wealthiest cities in the region, Downey, for its do-little approach to high levels of PFAS contamination in its groundwater.


Vasquez-Wilson stated to Political Life, "This lawsuit is meant to intimidate and bully me. It’s meant to silence me about the high levels of PFAS contaminants in our water."


Prior to the resolution of the lawsuit, the District’s attorney, Robert C. Baker, filed for a temporary restraining order to stop Vasquez-Wilson from using the District’s name and letterhead in her communications. Baker is often criticized by Vasquez-Wilson, as well as Director Martha Camacho-Rodriguez, during Board meetings.


Central Basin

In responding to Baker's filing alleging a threat from Vasquez-Wilson speaking with media and the public, Vasquez-Wilson's attorney wrote that "The alleged threat is only in Mr. Baker's mind and based on information and belief, not actual admissible evidence. Mr. Baker's unfounded fears do not support injunctive relief denying Defendant's Vasquez's First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech."



The Court instructed the parties to speak with one another, but did not issue an opinion on the substance of the case.



330 views0 comments

Comentarios


Los comentarios se han desactivado.
bottom of page